<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913</id><updated>2012-02-16T04:10:43.188-05:00</updated><category term='media'/><category term='.info'/><category term='yahoo'/><category term='.gov'/><category term='trojan horse'/><category term='cable'/><category term='peter king'/><category term='China'/><category term='box'/><category term='mctague'/><category term='Time Warner'/><category term='segway'/><category term='lottery'/><category term='AOL'/><category term='sony'/><category term='malware'/><category term='trademark'/><category term='domain names'/><category term='iservices.a'/><category term='mobile phones'/><category term='privacy'/><category term='fox'/><category term='.cn'/><category term='infringement'/><category term='service'/><category term='olympics'/><category term='first amendment'/><category term='riley'/><category term='job'/><category term='supreme court'/><category term='condominium'/><category term='illinois'/><category term='spam'/><category term='starbucks'/><category term='license'/><category term='united states'/><category term='Spin-Off'/><category term='FCC'/><category term='mcafee'/><category term='alabama'/><category term='emoticon'/><category term='racketerring'/><category term='fraud'/><category term='south carolina'/><category term='voting'/><category term='bittorrent'/><category term='boston globe'/><category term='lanham'/><category term='kollin'/><category term='russia'/><category term='new york times'/><category term='retaliation'/><category term='camera'/><category term='.hk'/><category term='gatehouse'/><category term='internal investigation'/><category term='ATT download comcast dsl capacity limits'/><category term='cell phone'/><category term='antitrust'/><category term='discrimination'/><category term='trojan'/><category term='ryan'/><category term='Google'/><category term='fortune'/><category term='Nigeria'/><category term='options'/><category term='copyright'/><category term='patent'/><category term='.jp'/><category term='.com'/><category term='condo'/><category term='telecommunications'/><category term='mac'/><category term='virus'/><category term='stock'/><category term='jurisdiction'/><category term='fleeting expletive'/><category term='.au'/><category term='scam'/><category term='satellite'/><category term='iworks'/><category term='ICO'/><category term='Global'/><title type='text'>Joel's Law Blog</title><subtitle type='html'>This is where I'll tell you what to think, how to think and why to think what I just told you to think.
A thought provoking discussion on law, technology, cyberspace, culture and whatever else comes to my mind</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default?start-index=101&amp;max-results=100'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>197</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-6185960747811336934</id><published>2009-08-30T20:47:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-08-30T20:55:25.720-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Cyberkill</title><content type='html'>Details of new &lt;a href="http://www.politechbot.com/docs/rockefeller.revised.cybersecurity.draft.082709.pdf"&gt;legislation&lt;/a&gt; to be introduced by Sen. Jay Rockefeller are leaking.  Essentially, the legislation in its current form would give the President the power to declare a "cyber-emergency" and allow him or her to turn off the internet.  It would also create a licensing standard for technology professionals to create a single standard.  In the bill there is no definition of what is a "cyber-emergency" or any bounds to the President's powers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is a road paved with good intentions, and we know where that leads.  Giving the President a kill switch and giving the President a blank check to declare a cyber-emergency is ridiculous.  Let private industry deal with cyber-threats and attacks; given some motivation I'm sure they'll come up with something before the government does.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-6185960747811336934?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/6185960747811336934/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=6185960747811336934&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6185960747811336934'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6185960747811336934'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/08/cyberkill.html' title='Cyberkill'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-1790499355780129367</id><published>2009-08-28T15:31:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-08-28T15:38:15.557-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Microsoft's Word Patent Appeal</title><content type='html'>An appeals court just set the hearing date for Microsoft's appeal of an injunction against them selling new products of Word for September 23, 2009.  HP and Dell are filing amicus briefs on Microsoft's behalf, arguing the injunction would hurt business.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-1790499355780129367?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/1790499355780129367/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=1790499355780129367&amp;isPopup=true' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1790499355780129367'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1790499355780129367'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/08/microsofts-word-patent-appeal.html' title='Microsoft&apos;s Word Patent Appeal'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-3275834318346281569</id><published>2009-08-28T12:57:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-08-28T13:06:57.467-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Preferred vs. Common</title><content type='html'>Professor Stephen Brainbridge wrote a terrific &lt;a href="http://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/2009/08/fiduciary-duties-and-preferred-stockholders.html"&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href="http://www.delawarelitigation.com/uploads/file/intA9(1).pdf"&gt;In Re: Trados Incorporated Shareholder Litigation&lt;/a&gt;, No. 1512-CC (July 24, 2009), analyzing the duties a director owes to preferred shareholders vis a vis common shareholders.  The court held that directors owe duties to common shareholders are common law in nature, where preferred shareholders are usually contractual in nature.  If common shareholders and preferred shareholders have divergent interests, directors should favor common law shareholders.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-3275834318346281569?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/3275834318346281569/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=3275834318346281569&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/3275834318346281569'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/3275834318346281569'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/08/preferred-vs-common.html' title='Preferred vs. Common'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-5294006222238946628</id><published>2009-08-03T13:21:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-08-03T13:24:14.508-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Schmidt resigns from Apple board</title><content type='html'>Google CEO Eric Schmidt resigned from Apple's board of directors citing a conflict of interest.  And that has nothing to do with the Federal Trade Commission's investigation of Apple-Google collusion in the marketplace.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-5294006222238946628?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/5294006222238946628/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=5294006222238946628&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/5294006222238946628'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/5294006222238946628'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/08/schmidt-resigns-from-apple-board.html' title='Schmidt resigns from Apple board'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-2486811825226726079</id><published>2009-08-03T13:17:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-08-03T13:18:41.966-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Virtual Taxation</title><content type='html'>Adam Chodorow has published an &lt;a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1440291"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; detailing a possible solution on tracking basis on virtual assets for tax purposes.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-2486811825226726079?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/2486811825226726079/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=2486811825226726079&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2486811825226726079'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2486811825226726079'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/08/virtual-taxation.html' title='Virtual Taxation'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-4138386152932079045</id><published>2009-07-28T09:54:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-28T10:01:43.267-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Insider Trading</title><content type='html'>We've had the Second Circuit finally speak in &lt;a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/52d8ea25-6c89-4dc3-b336-780f40c5621f/2/doc/08-0201-cv_opn.pdf"&gt;SEC v. Dorozhko &lt;/a&gt;regarding the liability of people who owe no fiduciary duty to the source of the information who steals inside information and makes a profit off of it.  The Second Circuit held "[T]he Supreme Court has in a number of opinions carefully established that the essential component of a § 10(b) violation is a breach of a fiduciary duty to disclose or abstain that coincides with a securities transaction.”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One of the interesting aspects of the case is the subtle shift from the fiduciary base theory of US v. O'Hagan to a property rights approach.  To quote the quoteable Steven Bainbridge in his &lt;a href="http://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/2009/07/the-second-circuits-recent-decision-in-sec-v-dorozhko-available-here-dealt-with-one-of-the-questions-left-open-by-the.html"&gt;blog post&lt;/a&gt; about the case:  "If a law student had written the Dorozhko, I’d give him a D (and only because I never ever fail anybody). It is not an interpretation of O’Hagan. It is the creation of an entirely new version of misappropriation liability., carved out of whole cloth and without any regard for precedent. It may be right on policy, but isn’t that for the Supreme Court to decide."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This theory also goes with the recent dismissal of the complaint against Mark Cuban for insider trading as well.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-4138386152932079045?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/4138386152932079045/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=4138386152932079045&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4138386152932079045'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4138386152932079045'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/07/insider-trading.html' title='Insider Trading'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-2523240975824034953</id><published>2009-07-22T16:15:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-22T16:18:20.454-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Google not liable for search results</title><content type='html'>In Great Britain, the &lt;a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2009/1765.html"&gt;UK court &lt;/a&gt;has held that Google cannot be "regarded as a publisher" for its search results, giving Google immunity over libel claims in for any defamatory remarks that appear in search results.  Justice David Eady said that Google is not a publisher because searches are carried out entirely by computers and the search engine does not choose the terms itself.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-2523240975824034953?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/2523240975824034953/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=2523240975824034953&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2523240975824034953'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2523240975824034953'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/07/google-not-liable-for-search-results.html' title='Google not liable for search results'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-2983292689793309412</id><published>2009-07-01T10:32:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-01T10:53:31.038-04:00</updated><title type='text'>New FHA Regulations for Condos</title><content type='html'>Housing and Urband Development issued Mortgagee Letter 2009-19 that provides new guidance for condominium projects eligibility under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008.  They are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I.          Approval Processing Options&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A. The lender will have two condominium project approval processing options.  The applicable documentation requirements will be the same for each option:&lt;br /&gt;1.      HUD Review and Approval Process (HRAP).&lt;br /&gt;2.      Direct Endorsement Lender Review and Approval Process (DELRAP).  This option is only available to lenders who have unconditional Direct Endorsement authority and staff with knowledge and expertise in reviewing and approving condominium projects.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;B. The processing options stated above will be applicable to condominium developments that are:  &lt;br /&gt;1. Proposed/Under Construction;&lt;br /&gt;2. Existing Construction; or&lt;br /&gt;3. Conversions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;II.                Eligible Projects&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Condominium Project has been created and exists in full compliance with applicable State law requirements of the jurisdiction in which the Condominium Project is located, and with all other applicable laws and regulations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;III.       Ineligible Projects&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A.    Condominium Hotel or “Condotels”&lt;br /&gt;B.     Timeshares or segmented ownership projects&lt;br /&gt;C.     Houseboat projects&lt;br /&gt;D.    Multi-dwelling unit condominiums [i.e. more than one dwelling per condominium unit]&lt;br /&gt;E.     All projects not deemed to be used primarily as residential&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;IV.       General Requirements&lt;/strong&gt;    &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A.    Site Condominiums&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Site Condominiums are single family detached dwellings encumbered by a declaration of condominium covenants or condominium form of ownership.  Condominium Project    approval is not required for Site Condominiums; however, the Condominium Rider (Attachment D) must be included in the FHA case binder submitted for insurance endorsement.&lt;a name="_Toc43697026"&gt;  Manufactured housing condominium projects (MHCPs) may not be processed as site condominiums; these projects will require approval under HRAP&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NOTE:  Site Condominiums requirements are effective immediately with issuance of this Mortgage Letter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;B.     “Spot Loan” Approval Process&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Spot Loan Approval process as defined in Mortgage Letter 1996-41 is eliminated with issuance of this guidance.  The DELRAP and HRAP processes have been streamlined to allow for uncomplicated condominium project approvals eliminating the need to approve units on a “spot loan” basis.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;C.     FHA-to-FHA Transactions Project Approval is not required for: a.       FHA‑to‑FHA streamline refinance transactions; orb.      FHA/HUD Real Estate Owned (REO) Division sales.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;D.    Environmental Review Requirements If a lender elects to use the HRAP option, then environmental reviews will not berequired for projects that, at the time that condominium project approval is requested,have progressed beyond that stage of construction where HUD has any influence over theremaining uncompleted construction.  This occurs when:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;·  a condominium plat or similar development plan and any phases delineated therein have been reviewed and approved by the local jurisdiction and, if applicable, recorded in the land records, and&lt;br /&gt;·         the construction of the project’s infrastructure (streets, stormwater management, water and sewage systems, utilities, facilities (e.g., parking lots, community building, swimming pools, golf course, playground, etc.) and buildings containing the condominium units has proceeded to a point that precludes any major changes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Environmental reviews will not be required for condominium projects approved using theDELRAP option.  If the appraiser identifies an environmental condition or the lender isaware of an existing environmental condition through remarks provided on the Builder’sCertification, form HUD-92541, the appraisal or other known documentation, the lendermust avoid or mitigate the following conditions before completing its review process:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1.      The project is located in a Special Flood Hazard Area designated on a Federal Emergency Management Agency flood map.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; 2.      Potential noise issues, where the property is located within 1000 feet of a highway, freeway, or heavily traveled road, within 3000 feet of a railroad, or within one mile of an airport or five miles of a military airfield.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3.      The property has an unobstructed view, or is located within 2000 feet, of any facility handling or storing explosive or fire-prone materials.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4.      The property is located within 3000 feet of a dump or landfill, or of a site on an EPA Superfund (NPL) list or equivalent state list, or a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment indicates the presence of a Recognized Environmental Condition or recommends further (Phase II) assessment for the presence of contaminants that could affect the site.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;5.      The property has any hazards or adverse conditions listed in Section 1.f. of the Builder’s Certification, including, but not limited to, high ground water levels, unstable soils, or earth fill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;6.      The project is located in a wetland designated on National Wetlands Inventory maps or designated by State or local authorities.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;7.      The project is on the National Register of Historic Places or is within a historic district listed on the Register.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;8.      The appraiser or DE lender is aware of any other condition that could adversely affect the health or safety of the residents of the project.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;V.        Project Eligibility Requirements&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A.     The following requirements apply to all Condominium Project approvals:&lt;br /&gt;·         Projects consist of two units or more.&lt;br /&gt;·         Projects must be covered by hazard and liability insurance and, when applicable, flood insurance.&lt;br /&gt;·         Right of first refusal is permitted unless it violates discriminatory conduct under the Fair Housing Act regulation in 24 CFR 100.&lt;br /&gt;·         No more than 25 percent of the property’s total floor area in a project can be used for commercial purposes.  The commercial portion of the project must be of a nature that is homogenous with residential use, which is free of adverse conditions to the occupants of the individual condominium units. &lt;br /&gt;·         No more than 10 percent of the units may be owned by one investor.  This will apply to developers/builders that subsequently rent vacant and unsold units.  For two and three unit condominium projects, no single entity may own more than one unit within the project; all units, common elements, and facilities within the project must be 100 percent complete; and only one unit can be conveyed to non-owner occupants.&lt;br /&gt;·         No more than 15 percent of the total units can be in arrears (more than 30 days past due) of their condominium association fee payment. &lt;br /&gt;·         At least 50 percent of the total units must be sold prior to endorsement of any mortgage on a unit. Valid presales include an executed sales agreement and evidence that a lender is willing to make the loan.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="" style="mso-footnote-id: ftn1" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=194886673837915223#_ftn1" name="_ftnref1"&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;  ·         At least 50 percent of the units of a project must be owner-occupied or sold to owners who intend to occupy the units.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="" style="mso-footnote-id: ftn2" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=194886673837915223#_ftn2" name="_ftnref2"&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; For proposed, under construction or projects still in their initial marketing phase, FHA will allow a minimum owner occupancy amount equal to 50 percent of the number of presold units (the minimum presales requirement of 50 percent still applies). &lt;br /&gt;·         Legal Phasing is permitted for condominium processing.  It is recommended that developers submit all known phases for initial project approval.  For purposes of calculating the owner-occupancy percentage:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; a.       On multi-phased projects the owner-occupancy percentage is calculated on the first declared phase and cumulatively on subsequent phases if the ownership of the condominium project remains the same;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;b.      If multi-phasing includes separate ownership per phase, each phase is calculated individually; orc.       Single-phase condominium project approval requests must meet the owner-occupancy percentage requirement.&lt;br /&gt; ·         FHA Concentration&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;a.      Projects consisting of three or less units will have no more than one unit encumbered with FHA insurance.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;b.     Projects consisting of four or more units will have no more than 30 percent of the total units encumbered with FHA insurance.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;·         Reserve Study - a current reserve study must be performed to assure that adequate funds are available for the funding of capital expenditures and maintenance.  A current reserve study must be no more than 12 months old – if recent events or market conditions have affected the finished condition of the property that information must be included.  When reviewing the reserve study, consideration must be given to items that have been replaced after the time that the reserve study was completed. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;VI.       Manufactured Housing Condominium Projects&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Pursuant to HERA, manufactured housing condominium projects are now eligible for FHA mortgage insurance.  Accordingly, all outstanding and current FHA Manufactured Housing individual unit requirements remain applicable for both Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (HECM) and forward mortgages, including elevations in flood zones and foundation requirements.  MHCPs must be submitted to the applicable Homeownership Center for review and approval – these projects are ineligible for DELRAP processing.  MHCPs may not be processed as site condominiums; these projects will require approval under HRAP. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1.      Appraisal reporting requirements for condominium manufactured homes:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;a.          Appraisal must be reported on the Manufactured Home Appraisal Report (Fannie Mae Form 1004C).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;b.         Subject condominium project must be inspected and the Project Information section of the Individual Condominium Unit Appraisal Report (Fannie Mae Form 1073) must be completed and included as an addendum to the appraisal report.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;c.          Comparable sales must be condominium manufactured homes.  Detailed explanations must be provided when search parameters are expanded due to the lack of comparable sales in subject market area. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;VII.     Condominium Conversions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Conversion to condominiums occurs in those projects which involve changing the title of an existing structure generally under one title, to property that is separated into units so that the title to most units can be held separately.   Changes to condominium conversion requirements are defined below: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1.      The one-year waiting period requirement for conversions is eliminated;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2.      In the event that FHA is insuring a mortgage on a unit and an undivided interest in the common elements on a project undergoing remodeling or rehabilitation, the entire condominium project, including the common facilities, must be 100 percent completely built before any mortgage may be endorsed.  Escrow provisions will be permitted for weather related delays for common areas only.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;VIII.    FHA Connection (FHAC)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;System modifications will be made to capture additional information, remove obsolete fields, and identify points of contacts.  Major planned system modifications are: 1&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.      Establishment of a Condominium Project Approval screen in FHAC that will be used by DE lenders and HUD staff to enter approval, rejection and recertification data.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2.      System generated condominium project identification numbers based on the HOC of jurisdiction. NOTE:  While major system modifications have been identified, other modifications will be made and released as necessary to ensure collection of all valid information. I&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;X.       Condominium New Construction Pre-approval and Inspection Requirements Mortgagee Letter 2001-27 prohibited condominium processing under those guidelines.  This Mortgagee Letter now permits condominium processing under the policy as established below. In cases where a building permit and a certificate of occupancy (or its equivalent) are issued by a local jurisdiction that performs a minimum of three inspections (typically the footing, framing and final) neither an Early Start Letter nor a HUD approved ten-year warranty plan is required.  For those jurisdictions that do not issue a building permit (or its equivalent) prior to construction and a Certificate of Occupancy (or its equivalent) upon completion of construction, a condominium unit that is one year old or less must have either an Early Start Letter (with a minimum of three inspections by an FHA Roster Inspector) or be covered by a HUD-approved ten-year warranty plan (with a final inspection by a FHA Roster Inspector) to be eligible for high-ratio mortgage insurance.  All condominium types are eligible to follow this process (e.g. Multi-family).  Projects are still required to be on the FHA-approved condominium list. FHA will require the completion and retention of the following documents when processing new construction condominium project approvals: &lt;br /&gt;·         Builder’s Certification of Plans, Specifications and Site, form HUD-92541&lt;br /&gt;·         Builder’s Warranty, form HUD-92544&lt;br /&gt;·         Building Permit (or its equivalent)&lt;br /&gt;·         Final Certificate of Occupancy (or its equivalent)            &lt;br /&gt;FHA will not accept a temporary Certificate of Occupancy; all units within the building(where the specific unit that is security for the insured financing is located) must be complete. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;X&lt;strong&gt;.        General Processing Steps for DELRAP or HRAP&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A.    Determine acceptability of the site and location of the project. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;B.     Review the project’s financial and legal documents; if acceptable, authorized personnel will sign and date the Lender Certification of Condominium Requirements &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;C.     Place the Lender Certification of Condominium Requirements and other required certifications in the FHA case binder. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;D.    Retain and maintain all documents used to review and approve the project for a period of three years from the date of project approval.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;E.     Mixed condominium review and processing is not permitted.  If a lender opts to participate in the DELRAP process, all future processing submissions must be processed, accordingly, in that sole and particular manner with the exception of manufactured housing condominium project approvals (these must be submitted to the applicable Homeownership Center for review and approval).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;F.      If a project is listed as Rejected or Withdrawn on the FHA-approved condominiums list, the only approval process accepted is HRAP.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;G.    Second and subsequent lenders that submit a unit for insurance in a project that is listed on the FHA-approved condominium list are not required to complete any further approval process.  At the lender’s discretion, they may seek any additional information to satisfy their own requirements and/or perform their own due diligence.  FHA will require the lender to certify it has no knowledge of circumstances or conditions that might have an adverse effect on the project or cause a mortgage secured by a unit in the project to become delinquent.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;H.    Subsequent phases being approved by a different lender must follow the general procedures listed here in Section X.  The original lender must also follow these general procedures but will have already satisfied some of the steps listed. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I.       All required certifications, as applicable, must be included in the FHA case binder submitted for insurance endorsement. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;J.       For both new construction and conversions if the developer intends to market five or more units within the next 12 months with FHA mortgage insurance, an Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan (AFHMP) or a Voluntary Affirmative Marketing Agreement (VAMA) must be in place.  Form HUD-935.2C, Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan – Condominium or Cooperatives, is to be used for condominium projects.  This completed form must be submitted to the Director of the Processing and Underwriting Division in the jurisdictional HOC for approval.  If “a, b, c, or d” is checked on response to Question 2 in the Applicability section, the developer is not required to complete an AFHMP.  The developer should complete block 11 on form HUD-92541, Builder’s Certification of Plans, Specification and Site. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;K.    Environmental reviews will be required for proposed and under construction project approvals submitted under the HRAP option consistent with the Environmental Review Requirements listed in Section IV.  D.  Environmental review is not required under DELRAP, but the lender must take necessary actions to avoid or mitigate identified environmental conditions prior to completing its project review.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;L.     Transfer of control of the Homeowners Association shall pass to the owners of units within the project no later than the earlier of the following:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1.      120 days after the date by which 75 percent of the units have been conveyed to the unit purchasers, or &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2.      One year after completion of the project evidence by the first conveyance to a unit purchaser. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;XI.       Certification for Initial Approval&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lenders must provide certifications on company letterhead signed by a company authorized representative (signature stamps or electronic signatures are not authorized) that:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1.      The eligible condominium project complies with applicable FHA requirements addressed within this Mortgagee Letter;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2.      All condominium legal documents meet HUD regulations, state and local condominium laws; and3.      Pre-sale and owner occupancy ratios per loan are met. NOTE:  FHA will not require an attorney's certification; however, lenders may obtain this as part of their due diligence process.  Lenders are reminded that this document will not replace other condominium certifications required from the lender.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;XII.     Certification of Projects Previously Approved&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If a project has been previously approved, lenders must certify that they are not aware of any change in circumstances since initial approval of the project that would result in the project no longer complying with FHA requirements. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;XIII.         Recertification of Project Approvals&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Condominium Project approvals will expire two years from the date it has been placed onthe list of approved condominiums.  This will also apply to all projects currently on the list of approved condominiums.  Further participation in the program after this two-year period has expired will require recertification to determine that the project is still in compliance with HUD’s owner-occupancy requirement and that no conditions currently exist which would present an unacceptable risk to FHA.  Items that should be given consideration are:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1.      Pending special assessments,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2.      Pending legal action against the condominium association, or its officers or directors,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3.      Hazard, liability insurance and when applicable flood insurance. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;XIV.       Quality Assurance&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Monitoring the condominium approval process is critical to the success of the program.  Lenders who approve condominium projects utilizing the DELRAP option will be required to submit a copy of the complete condominium project approval package to the applicable Homeownership Center within five business days of approval.  Lenders are required to submit the first five DELRAP approvals for review.  Further, to manage FHA’s risk, and ensure compliance with all condominium project policy requirements, additional condominium project approvals will be selected for review.  The criteria for selection of the additional approvals will be determined and lenders will be notified in future guidance. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;XV.          False Certifications&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Title 18 U.S.C. 1014, provides in part that whoever knowingly and willfully makes or uses a document containing any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, in any matter in the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States, shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned for not more than 30 years or both.  In addition, violation of this or others may result in debarment and civil liability for damages suffered by the Department.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;XVI.&lt;/strong&gt;       &lt;strong&gt;Insurance of Individual Units&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;All applicable, outstanding and any additional FHA insurance requirements not defined in this guidance must be met for individual units.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="" style="mso-footnote-id: ftn1" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=194886673837915223#_ftnref1" name="_ftn1"&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; Secondary residences can only be included if it meets the requirements of 24 CFR 203.18(f)(2).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="" style="mso-footnote-id: ftn2" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=194886673837915223#_ftnref2" name="_ftn2"&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; If the owner-occupancy ratio includes presales, FHA requires an executed sales agreement and corresponding evidence that a lender is willing to make the loan and the buyer intends to occupy the unit.  A separate owner-occupancy certification is also required in the FHA case binder for loans where the Individual Condominium Unit Appraisal Report, Fannie Mae Form 1073, does not contain the required data or the condominium project is proposed or under construction.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-2983292689793309412?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/2983292689793309412/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=2983292689793309412&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2983292689793309412'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2983292689793309412'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/07/new-fha-regulations-for-condos.html' title='New FHA Regulations for Condos'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-3232677344312098152</id><published>2009-07-01T10:28:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-01T10:31:58.033-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Dutch Treat</title><content type='html'>The Dutch Supreme Court recently &lt;a href="http://zoeken.rechtspraak.nl/resultpage.aspx?snelzoeken=true&amp;amp;searchtype=ljn&amp;amp;ljn=BI0468"&gt;held&lt;/a&gt; that if a director of a company commits a tort towards a company's creidtor, and is therefore personally liable towards that creditor, if the director enters into an obligation on behalf of the company while he knew or reasonably should have known that the company would not - or not within a reasonable period - be able to fulfill its obligation and would not offer recourse for the damage suffered by the creditor as a result of the malperformance, unless the director is able to show that he personally did not make a sufficiently serious mistake in this respect.  &lt;a href="http://www.thedefiningtension.com/"&gt;www.thedefiningtension.com&lt;/a&gt; I just wanted to remind everyone that American law is very different in that in the United States directors do not act as agents of a corporation.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-3232677344312098152?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/3232677344312098152/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=3232677344312098152&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/3232677344312098152'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/3232677344312098152'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/07/dutch-treat.html' title='Dutch Treat'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-4512090541231301359</id><published>2009-07-01T10:24:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-01T10:27:35.897-04:00</updated><title type='text'>More on Shareholder Access</title><content type='html'>The ABA just proposed amendments to the Model Business Corporation Act that seem to do a better job with respect to shareholder access to proxy nominations.  They will be published shortly in the August edition of the Business Lawyer.  Essentially, the amendments will provide for companies to provide their own procedures to allow shareholder access.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-4512090541231301359?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/4512090541231301359/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=4512090541231301359&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4512090541231301359'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4512090541231301359'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/07/more-on-shareholder-access.html' title='More on Shareholder Access'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-1889632442236224044</id><published>2009-06-29T15:15:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-29T15:21:57.478-04:00</updated><title type='text'>No More Commercials</title><content type='html'>The Supreme Court denied cert on an appeal by the entertainment industry to block Cablevision Systems Corp new DVR that saves the shows at the cable location, not the user location, making the DVR service more like download on demand than a DVR. Licensing rates for broadcast is different than download on demand. The entertainment industry claimed it violated their copyrights, but the Second Circuit differed.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-1889632442236224044?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/1889632442236224044/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=1889632442236224044&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1889632442236224044'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1889632442236224044'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/06/no-more-commercials.html' title='No More Commercials'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-9127401567017922837</id><published>2009-06-29T15:05:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-29T15:09:18.738-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Florida 2008-9 Legislative Update</title><content type='html'>The Sun-Senitnel has an article giving an update regarding laws to go in effect July 1, 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cigarette tax&lt;br /&gt;Florida's cigarette tax increases by $1 per pack, to $1.34. The tax on other tobacco products, including pipe and smokeless tobacco, also goes up by a similar rate. Cigars are exempt from the increase. With the hike, Florida's cigarette tax -- previously unchanged since 1990 and among the lowest in the nation -- is now slightly higher than average. The extra $1 tax is expected to generate more than $900 million in income, used to fund cancer research and defray Medicaid costs.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Pill mills&lt;br /&gt;Despite privacy concerns, anyone who buys addictive prescription drugs at pain clinics will be reported to a state database designed to crack down on clinics and doctors that distribute painkillers. Florida becomes the 39th state to create such a pain-pill database, but it could take a while to gear up. The state has to raise millions from private sources to operate the database and the Department of Health has until October 2010 to instruct pain clinics and their doctors on how to report their sales.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Seat belts&lt;br /&gt;Drivers in Florida can now be pulled over for not wearing their seat belts -- and get slapped with tickets that could run more than $100 depending on the county. Until now, drivers could only be cited for not wearing their seat belts if they were pulled over for something else, such as speeding. The state fine for seat-belt violations is $35, but counties can tack on additional fees and court costs.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Insurance&lt;br /&gt;Customers with state-run Citizens Property Insurance Co. will see their premiums rise, for the first time in two years. Most of Citizens' 1 million policyholders, the majority of whom live in South Florida, will see rates rise 10 percent a year for at least five years, beginning Jan. 1. Private insurers also are likely to raise premiums in 2010, although they'll still have to get permission from the state Office of Insurance Regulation. A change to state law provides a quicker process for private insurers to boost premiums up to 10 percent a year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Property tax appeals&lt;br /&gt;Florida property owners will now have an easier time winning an appeal if they think a county appraiser valued their homes too high. The burden is now on county appraisers to justify their values. In prior years, homeowners had to clear a high legal hurdle to prove the government appraisal was wrong. With the change, more homeowners should be able to win reductions on their tax bills through quasi-judicial Value Adjustment Boards, state analysts predict.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;KidCare&lt;br /&gt;Parents who lose their jobs -- or can no longer afford health care premiums -- will now have an easier time enrolling their children in KidCare, a federal-state subsidized health care program for children under 18. The waiting period to switch from private insurance to KidCare has been reduced to two months, from six months. And parents who fall behind on the $15 or $20 monthly co-pay for KidCare will have to wait only 30 days to re-enroll, instead of 60 days. The state also cut down administrative barriers to KidCare enrollment. For example, income eligibility now is verified electronically rather than in person. A family of four making $44,000 or less is eligible for KidCare, which currently insures about 1.5 million Florida children.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Bright Futures&lt;br /&gt;Changes to popular but expensive Bright Futures scholarships will make the program less lucrative for college students. Now, Bright Futures students will receive a flat scholarship award, from $95 to $126 per credit hour, rather than the traditional scholarship that covered up to 100 percent of tuition costs. The flat rate will not cover this year's 8 to 15 percent tuition hikes at state universities, meaning students will pay potentially thousands more out of pocket for each year in school.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Prepaid college&lt;br /&gt;Parents who save for their children's education through so-called 529 prepaid plans will now have additional flexibility to transfer the money to private and out-of-state colleges and career centers. Until now, parents could only get the full benefit from 529 savings plans if their children enrolled in Florida public universities and community colleges.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Phone rates&lt;br /&gt;Florida's home phone service is now deregulated, with the Public Service Commission no longer having authority to set rates and service standards. Under the new system, phone companies such as AT&amp;amp;T will be allowed to raise rates with no state oversight on most home phone packages, by up to 10 percent a year. Telecommunications executives, though, point out that competition is driving prices down rather than up. In addition, phone companies will be able to post their rate schedules online rather than with the PSC. The changes also expand the state's Lifeline program, which provides subsidized basic phone service to the poor. A single person making less than $16,245 will now qualify for free or reduced-cost phone service.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; First-responder fees&lt;br /&gt;Cities and counties are now banned from charging a so-called "crash tax," a concept once considered by Davie and other municipalities. Local governments are now prohibited from charging a first-responder fee for a police officer to respond to the scene of an accident or for ambulance rides.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-9127401567017922837?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/9127401567017922837/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=9127401567017922837&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/9127401567017922837'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/9127401567017922837'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/06/florida-2008-9-legislative-update.html' title='Florida 2008-9 Legislative Update'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-1636859351663908775</id><published>2009-06-19T13:32:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-19T13:34:05.052-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Dowload Case</title><content type='html'>A Minneapolis jury awarded the RIAA $1.92 million against Jammie Thomas-Rasset for illegal file sharing.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-1636859351663908775?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/1636859351663908775/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=1636859351663908775&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1636859351663908775'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1636859351663908775'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/06/dowload-case.html' title='Dowload Case'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-6745563024418599669</id><published>2009-06-19T13:27:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-19T13:32:25.692-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Right to Privacy?</title><content type='html'>Applicants for jobs in the city of Bozeman are being asked for passwords to their social networking sites.  It is suposedly designed to verify personal information.  But I find it had to believe that there's anything on somebody's facebook or myspace page that could not be verified by other means.  The city attorney is looking into alternatives, such as requiring the job applicant to friend the city.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-6745563024418599669?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/6745563024418599669/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=6745563024418599669&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6745563024418599669'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6745563024418599669'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/06/right-to-privacy.html' title='Right to Privacy?'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-6882706655521191668</id><published>2009-06-18T14:50:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-18T15:04:16.148-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Las Vegas Paper to Produce Online Records</title><content type='html'>The Las Vegas Review-Journal will comply with a Federal Grand Jury subpoena compelling the identities of two people who posted comments on the newspaper's website about a criminal tax trial that could be construed as threatening to the jurors and/or judge.  The paper said there isn't much to produce given that most of their postings are anonymous.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-6882706655521191668?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/6882706655521191668/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=6882706655521191668&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6882706655521191668'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6882706655521191668'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/06/las-vegas-paper-to-produce-online.html' title='Las Vegas Paper to Produce Online Records'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-4462348594905780110</id><published>2009-06-16T13:47:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-16T13:50:49.206-04:00</updated><title type='text'>SEC Rule Proposal</title><content type='html'>Below is a letter sent to the SEC with regards to their newest rule proposal allowing shareholders to nominate directors on the company's proxy statement:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ms. Elizabeth M. Murphy&lt;br /&gt;Secretary&lt;br /&gt;Securities and Exchange Commission&lt;br /&gt;100 F Street, NE&lt;br /&gt;Washington, DC 20549-1090&lt;br /&gt;Security and Exchange Commission&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Re:      File Number S7-10-09&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To Whom It May Concern:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I would like to take this opportunity to comment on the Security and Exchange Commission’s proposed rules regarding shareholder nominations for the Board of Directors.  Although I am an attorney this letter is being sent on my own individual behalf and neither on behalf of my firm, nor any particular client.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The SEC’s proposed rule would allow shareholders to nominate directors and require the company to include such nominations on its proxy statements.  Although noble in its efforts to the proposal is troubling in several aspects. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;First, the boards of directors of corporations in the United States of America have essentially two functions, namely, as an advisor to the executive management of the corporation and as a monitor on behalf of the shareholders.  These duties may be in tension at times or namely when the board feels that the executive management of a corporation is not performing on behalf of shareholders, and on the flip side, whereas management has a vested interest in the long term success of the corporation, shareholders do not.  The SEC’s proposed rule would favor a huge swing in Board responsibility toward a monitoring activity of a board rather than serving as advise and counsel to management.  Such a swing could exacerbate adverse and confrontational roles between Boards and management, where the board of directors becomes more interested in the short terms goals of the shareholders than long term goals of management.  This is especially true in that the proposed rules allow shareholders with as little as one percent, (including shareholders aggregating their shares to reach the one percent threshold who are more likely to be pro-holder activists and special interest holders).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Second, the SEC’s role may be overlapping with existing state laws.  By way of example, Delaware General Corporate Law, Section 112, provides certain procedures for shareholders to include in the corporation solicitation of proxies their own nominees and slate for directors.  Historically, the federal government has left states to determine the internal affairs of the corporation recognizing that the internal affairs of the corporation regulation allow states to compete for various state businesses.  The SEC’s entry into the internal governance market may put some states that compete with Delaware at a significant disadvantage if this proposal were to be adopted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Third, the rules proposed by the SEC provide that only certain significant shareholders or groups of shareholders would be allowed to nominate directors.  Shareholders of the size proposed by the Security and Exchange Commission already have significant direct and indirect participation in management.  Such a rule simply would not benefit ordinary investors whose investments do not quality under the rules.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Fourth, I am troubled with the priority system if there are more shareholder nominations than slots available.  The current rule as it is stated would allow the shareholders who get to the company first their nominations to be put on the proxy regardless of size.  This is counter-productive to the shareholder democracy movement which would require the SEC’s rule to allocate director nominations spots according to size by way of example, a long term institutional investor holding in excess of five percent of a company’s equity would be subject to smaller shareholders who can run faster with their director nominations.  This system will create an incentive for routine election contests rather than facilitate smooth an orderly corporate governance.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lastly, this will only serve as an adverse affect on the valuation of companies because of the additional restrictions imposed by the commission.  One major example is that shareholders would be required to certify that they are not holding their stock for the purposes of taking control of the company or gain more than a minority representation of the Board of Directors.  By removing the possibility of the opportunity of changing control of the company, the commission would create a chilling effect on valuation of companies, in that in a company’s valuation there may be albeit however small, some percentage for possible takeover bids.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Overall, I would strongly urge the commission to reconsider this rule proposal because of the foregoing reasons.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sincerely,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Joel McTague&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-4462348594905780110?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/4462348594905780110/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=4462348594905780110&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4462348594905780110'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4462348594905780110'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/06/sec-rule-proposal.html' title='SEC Rule Proposal'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-4484255153258254732</id><published>2009-06-16T13:31:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-16T13:44:16.546-04:00</updated><title type='text'>2008 Delaware Year in Review</title><content type='html'>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance has a terrific review of developments in Delaware in 2008 which you can find &lt;a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/files/2009/06/bna-sec-reg-law-report.pdf"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-4484255153258254732?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/4484255153258254732/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=4484255153258254732&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4484255153258254732'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4484255153258254732'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/06/2008-delaware-year-in-review.html' title='2008 Delaware Year in Review'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-7288142188242009503</id><published>2009-05-28T13:28:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-16T13:31:16.302-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Time Warner'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Spin-Off'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='AOL'/><title type='text'>Time Warner</title><content type='html'>Time Warner is going to spin off AOL.  It will buy Google's 5% stake in AOL in the third quarter and spin them off sometime in the Fourth.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-7288142188242009503?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/7288142188242009503/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=7288142188242009503&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/7288142188242009503'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/7288142188242009503'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/05/time-warner.html' title='Time Warner'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-3581925338017947362</id><published>2009-05-21T13:06:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-21T13:08:34.781-04:00</updated><title type='text'>NetApp buys Data Domain</title><content type='html'>NetApp, Inc., agreed to buy Data Domain for $25 per share, or approximately $1.5 billion.  The belief is that NetApp has the distribution channels and a much deeper consumer base that needs Data Domain's product line.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-3581925338017947362?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/3581925338017947362/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=3581925338017947362&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/3581925338017947362'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/3581925338017947362'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/05/netapp-buys-data-domain.html' title='NetApp buys Data Domain'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-9114901675589094013</id><published>2009-05-21T13:03:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-21T13:06:36.370-04:00</updated><title type='text'>French Update</title><content type='html'>In a previous post, I discussed how France was trying to enact legislation that would punish internet pirates by severing internet connections to convicted repeat offenders.  It passed.  The Socialist Party in France has already challenged the law before the Constitutional Council to determine if the law's ability to enact punishment before the offender had a chance to contest the charges is constitutional in France.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-9114901675589094013?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/9114901675589094013/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=9114901675589094013&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/9114901675589094013'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/9114901675589094013'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/05/french-update.html' title='French Update'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-2981809008468581109</id><published>2009-04-30T12:47:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-04-30T12:50:38.099-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Pirate Bay in Sweden</title><content type='html'>Dagens Nyheter's latest poll shows 5.1 percent of Swedish voters support the Pirate Party.  The Pirate Party is a group of individuals who ran the file sharing site Pirate Bay and were recently convicted of copyright violations and sentence to one year in prison.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As a footnote, you only need for percent of the vote in order to gain a seat in the European Parliament.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-2981809008468581109?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/2981809008468581109/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=2981809008468581109&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2981809008468581109'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2981809008468581109'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/04/pirate-bay-in-sweden.html' title='Pirate Bay in Sweden'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-5162724164931823678</id><published>2009-04-30T12:43:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-04-30T12:47:07.544-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Arrrh!  Internet Privacy in France</title><content type='html'>France is considering legislation to punish internet privacy.  The measure would create a new government agency to track pirates.  First time offendors would receive an e-mail warning; for second offenses a certified letter, and for the third and subsequent downloads their internet connections severed for as long as one year.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-5162724164931823678?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/5162724164931823678/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=5162724164931823678&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/5162724164931823678'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/5162724164931823678'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/04/arrrh-internet-privacy-in-france.html' title='Arrrh!  Internet Privacy in France'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-8394962955208592317</id><published>2009-04-28T13:50:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-04-28T13:56:44.112-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Violations of Privacy</title><content type='html'>California just issued an interesting ruling in &lt;a href="http://fsnews.findlaw.com/cases/ca/caapp4th/slip/2009/f054138.html"&gt;Moreno v. Hanford Sentinel&lt;/a&gt; over the question of privacy.  At issue in this case was whether a psuedo-annonymous letter posted on myspace could be reprinted without the author's consent in a newspaper with her identity revealed.  Here, Cynthia Moreno wrote a poem called "An ode to Coalinga" on her Myspace page.  Her former high school principal somehow found it and had it published in the Letters to the Editor section, identifying Moreno's full name.  The poem, which was less than flattering, caused residents to boycot Moreno's father's business which was forced to shut down.  The court here ruled that her photo attached to the original posting prevented the posting from being anonymous.  They also allowed the intentional inflection of emotional distress claim to proceed, stating that "a jury should determine whether the alleged conduct was outrageous."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-8394962955208592317?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/8394962955208592317/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=8394962955208592317&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/8394962955208592317'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/8394962955208592317'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/04/violations-of-privacy.html' title='Violations of Privacy'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-4002054195963440558</id><published>2009-04-28T13:46:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-04-28T13:50:22.040-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='supreme court'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='first amendment'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='fox'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='fleeting expletive'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='FCC'/><title type='text'>Finally (maybe) . . . Fleeting Expletives</title><content type='html'>The Supreme Court today released their decision in &lt;a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/08pdf/07-582.pdf"&gt;FCC v. Fox&lt;/a&gt; holding that the FCC properly adopted the fleeting expletive rule.  Noting that it is a court of final review and not of first impression, the Court remanded to the Second Circuit the question of whether it violated the First Amendment or not.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-4002054195963440558?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/4002054195963440558/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=4002054195963440558&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4002054195963440558'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4002054195963440558'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/04/finally-maybe-fleeting-expletives.html' title='Finally (maybe) . . . Fleeting Expletives'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-7574271632638093557</id><published>2009-03-27T16:52:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-03-27T16:56:47.726-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Conficker</title><content type='html'>There's a new worm out there set to strike on April 1 called Conficker that's set to strike.  Nobody seems to know what it does except that all infected computers will come under the control of a master machine.  This is the third variant and expected to be bad.  You could get a free online safety scan from Microsoft &lt;a href="http://onecare.live.com/site/en-us/default.htm"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-7574271632638093557?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/7574271632638093557/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=7574271632638093557&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/7574271632638093557'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/7574271632638093557'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/03/conficker.html' title='Conficker'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-1959666455522576741</id><published>2009-03-27T16:45:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-03-27T16:51:16.675-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Titanic</title><content type='html'>It is widely expected that Judge Rebecca Beach Smith will rule that salvaged items from the Titanic must stay together and accessable to the public.  RMS Titanic Inc., a subsideriary of Premeir Exhibitions Inc., is the current salvor-in-possession but does not "own" the artifacts.  It appears that RMST will try to sell the rights to a museum.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-1959666455522576741?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/1959666455522576741/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=1959666455522576741&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1959666455522576741'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1959666455522576741'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/03/titanic.html' title='Titanic'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-6199621631816968737</id><published>2009-03-27T16:42:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-03-27T16:45:35.971-04:00</updated><title type='text'>This Bud Isn't For You</title><content type='html'>European Court of First Instance has just ruled that Anheuser-Busch-InBev does not have the rigths to the name Budweiser in the EU, awarding it to Budejovicky Budvar NP.  It's not certain how the ruling will affect InBev's marketing of American products in Europe.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-6199621631816968737?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/6199621631816968737/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=6199621631816968737&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6199621631816968737'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6199621631816968737'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/03/this-bud-isnt-for-you.html' title='This Bud Isn&apos;t For You'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-427666045181986642</id><published>2009-02-12T17:32:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-02-12T17:34:46.977-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Kindle 2 Copyright Royalty Controversy</title><content type='html'>Audiobooks and printed material are paid at different royalty rates.  Amazon's Kindle 2 could possibly violate the copyright laws in that its automated text to speech feature could be producing a different version of the book.  You can read more here:  &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123419309890963869.html"&gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123419309890963869.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-427666045181986642?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/427666045181986642/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=427666045181986642&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/427666045181986642'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/427666045181986642'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/02/kindle-2-copyright-royalty-controversy.html' title='Kindle 2 Copyright Royalty Controversy'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-7513087369033762762</id><published>2009-01-28T16:08:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-01-28T16:12:17.338-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Mail 5 days a week</title><content type='html'>Postmaster General Potter has said that the post office needs to drop one day a week of mail, such as a Tuesday.  The USPS experienced a 4.5% drop in volume last year, a rise in prices, and may experience the first year that revenues drop.  Maybe somebody should look at controlling costs or improving customer service.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-7513087369033762762?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/7513087369033762762/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=7513087369033762762&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/7513087369033762762'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/7513087369033762762'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/01/mail-5-days-week.html' title='Mail 5 days a week'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-1663327803656986811</id><published>2009-01-28T16:01:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-01-28T16:07:59.125-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Comcast Redux, but this time with Cox</title><content type='html'>A few months ago, the FCC ruled that Comcast violated principles of net neutrality by restricting downloads on peer to peer networks to a lower priority than other network traffic.  Now comes word that Cox is trying to do the same thing, giving what it considers time sensative data higher prioirty on networks when there is congestion.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-1663327803656986811?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/1663327803656986811/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=1663327803656986811&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1663327803656986811'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1663327803656986811'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/01/comcast-redux-but-this-time-with-cox.html' title='Comcast Redux, but this time with Cox'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-931858091161892886</id><published>2009-01-27T16:22:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-01-27T16:26:21.865-05:00</updated><title type='text'>New Patent for Apple</title><content type='html'>The USPTO has awarded a &lt;a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&amp;amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;amp;p=1&amp;amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&amp;amp;r=1&amp;amp;f=G&amp;amp;l=50&amp;amp;co1=AND&amp;amp;d=PTXT&amp;amp;s1=multitouch&amp;amp;OS=multitouch&amp;amp;RS=multitouch"&gt;patent&lt;/a&gt; to Apple for "multitouch" technology.  This allows a cell phone touchscreen to register multiple touches.  It looks like Apple will try to use the patent to stop the new Palm Pre from being released, or at least extort significant licensing fees from Palm.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-931858091161892886?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/931858091161892886/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=931858091161892886&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/931858091161892886'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/931858091161892886'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/01/new-patent-for-apple.html' title='New Patent for Apple'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-1682202956746851057</id><published>2009-01-27T16:20:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-01-27T16:22:42.044-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='camera'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='peter king'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='cell phone'/><title type='text'>Click!</title><content type='html'>Peter King, a congressman from New York, has introduced the &lt;a href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h414/show"&gt;Camera Phone Predator Alert Act &lt;/a&gt;which would require a cameraphone to make an audible sound within a reasonable radius of the phone when a picture is taken.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-1682202956746851057?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/1682202956746851057/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=1682202956746851057&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1682202956746851057'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1682202956746851057'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/01/click.html' title='Click!'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-2713946792290013766</id><published>2009-01-26T15:29:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2009-01-26T15:31:26.334-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='malware'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='iservices.a'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='bittorrent'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='iworks'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='mac'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='trojan horse'/><title type='text'>Mac Malware</title><content type='html'>As PC users watch, thousands of Macs are getting hit by a vicious malware attack by iServices.A Trojan horse.  The malware is being distributed over a BitTorrent copy of a bootleg copy of the iWorks 9.0.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-2713946792290013766?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/2713946792290013766/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=2713946792290013766&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2713946792290013766'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2713946792290013766'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/01/mac-malware.html' title='Mac Malware'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-2330643340027293041</id><published>2009-01-26T14:04:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-01-26T14:22:43.578-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Global'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='ICO'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='satellite'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='license'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='telecommunications'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='FCC'/><title type='text'>Gotta Spare Satellite?  Anyone?</title><content type='html'>FCC rules require mobile satellite providers to have a spare satellite available before rolling out a ground repeater network.  ICO Global just received a license from the FCC without the spare satellite so long as the company committs to having a spare spacecraft in place within one year of starting operations, relaxing the FCC's previous position that the spare had to be in place at the time of licensing.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-2330643340027293041?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/2330643340027293041/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=2330643340027293041&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2330643340027293041'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2330643340027293041'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/01/gotta-spare-satellite-anyone.html' title='Gotta Spare Satellite?  Anyone?'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-6001083191021822395</id><published>2009-01-26T14:01:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-01-26T14:04:46.446-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='new york times'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='copyright'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='gatehouse'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='infringement'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='media'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='boston globe'/><title type='text'>GateHouse, NY Times Settlement</title><content type='html'>GateHouse Media and the NY Times reached an agreement over the weekend regarding the Boston Globe's alleged copyright infringement of posting headlines and lead sentences from the NY Times website.  Trial was scheduled to begin today.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-6001083191021822395?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/6001083191021822395/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=6001083191021822395&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6001083191021822395'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6001083191021822395'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/01/gatehouse-ny-times-settlement.html' title='GateHouse, NY Times Settlement'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-962576215379432103</id><published>2009-01-26T13:56:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-01-26T14:01:50.764-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='supreme court'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='retaliation'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='internal investigation'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='job'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='discrimination'/><title type='text'>Retaliation</title><content type='html'>In a unanimous opinion, the US Supreme Court just decided &lt;a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/08pdf/06-1595.pdf"&gt;Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County&lt;/a&gt;, holding that federal laws prohibiting job discrimination cover an employee who cooperate with internal investigations of retaliation by their employees.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-962576215379432103?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/962576215379432103/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=962576215379432103&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/962576215379432103'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/962576215379432103'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/01/retaliation.html' title='Retaliation'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-4030825021679308151</id><published>2009-01-26T13:51:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-01-26T13:56:19.886-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='fortune'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='starbucks'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='stock'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='options'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Google'/><title type='text'>Reset Option</title><content type='html'>In an effort to raise company moral, Google has announced that it will allow more than 8 million stock options held by more than 17,000 company employees to be exercised at lower prices, but the company extended the vesting period for those options by one year.  Starbucks has already joined the repricing bandwagon, although not as generously as Google.  72 percent of the Fortune 500 companies could follow suit in that their employee options are underwater.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-4030825021679308151?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/4030825021679308151/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=4030825021679308151&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4030825021679308151'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4030825021679308151'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2009/01/reset-option.html' title='Reset Option'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-7897468165864856968</id><published>2008-12-15T17:35:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-12-15T17:38:42.859-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='emoticon'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='patent'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='trademark'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='russia'/><title type='text'>Trademarking Emoticons</title><content type='html'>In a move that seems surprising to me, the Rospatent Federal Patent Agency, Russia's patent authority, ruled that a businessman did not trademark ;-), an emoticon that denotes a smiling wink, by itself but as a part of a name, denying the businessman a chance to earn a fortune in licensing fees.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-7897468165864856968?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/7897468165864856968/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=7897468165864856968&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/7897468165864856968'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/7897468165864856968'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/12/trademarking-emoticons.html' title='Trademarking Emoticons'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-2486908211631520221</id><published>2008-11-06T17:14:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-11-06T17:16:44.361-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Buy Me Now!!!</title><content type='html'>In related stories, Google pulled out of the deal with Yahoo because in their opinion it would have been too hard to appease the Justice Department's antitrust division regarding the advertising deal.  On the flip side, Jerry Wang has asked Microsoft to come back to the table.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-2486908211631520221?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/2486908211631520221/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=2486908211631520221&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2486908211631520221'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2486908211631520221'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/11/buy-me-now.html' title='Buy Me Now!!!'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-5639955448480378309</id><published>2008-11-05T15:36:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2008-11-05T15:42:10.176-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Are you kidding me?</title><content type='html'>Mark Lange's editorial in the &lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20081105/cm_csm/ylange06"&gt;Christian Science Monitor &lt;/a&gt;I think is suspect.  He basically calls for regulation of the derivatives market as a solution to the current financial "crisis".  Let's consider the facts - most derivatives of the type he considers are held by large financial instutions and work really well.  The ones that we need to look at are asset securitizations which are done by everone from a retail store with accounts receivable to banks with huge mortgage portfolios.  The people in charge of buying and selling them for huge financial instutions shouldn't be protected by the government.  Imagine having to file additional security disclosures with the SEC prior to a company like Sears selling its credit card receivables to Bank of America.  Do companies like Sears and BoA really need government protection from making "computer-generated casino wagers" that have been well-vetted and understood by the fianancial community the past 30 someodd years?&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-5639955448480378309?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/5639955448480378309/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=5639955448480378309&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/5639955448480378309'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/5639955448480378309'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/11/are-you-kidding-me.html' title='Are you kidding me?'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-1941575180380812675</id><published>2008-11-05T15:34:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2008-11-05T15:35:59.614-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Stellar Patents</title><content type='html'>Mobile Satellite Ventures has received 25 patents for communications systems for rovers exploring the Moon or Mars.  Currently pending is one for an extraterrestrial communications systems covering satellites orbiting other planets, a base station of the planet, and repeaters.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-1941575180380812675?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/1941575180380812675/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=1941575180380812675&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1941575180380812675'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1941575180380812675'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/11/stellar-patents.html' title='Stellar Patents'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-6984217166206268542</id><published>2008-11-05T15:31:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2008-11-05T15:34:03.409-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Supreme Court Takes Up Profanity Case</title><content type='html'>Let's talk about those words you can't say on television.  The Supreme Court is going to hear the case about fleeting explatives on appeal from the 2nd Circuit.  The Supreme Court did turn down without explanation C-SPAN's request to release a recording of oral arguments.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-6984217166206268542?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/6984217166206268542/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=6984217166206268542&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6984217166206268542'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6984217166206268542'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/11/supreme-court-takes-up-profanity-case.html' title='Supreme Court Takes Up Profanity Case'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-704314972371022726</id><published>2008-11-05T11:07:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-11-05T11:12:48.964-05:00</updated><title type='text'>FCC cancels vote on telecom overhaul</title><content type='html'>Kevin Martin cancelled the vote on telecom overhaul bill.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-704314972371022726?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/704314972371022726/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=704314972371022726&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/704314972371022726'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/704314972371022726'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/11/fcc-cancels-vote-on-telecom-overhaul.html' title='FCC cancels vote on telecom overhaul'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-8564715448238200935</id><published>2008-11-05T11:00:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2008-11-05T11:07:41.461-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='ATT download comcast dsl capacity limits'/><title type='text'>ATT's Pareto Principle</title><content type='html'>According to AT&amp;amp;T, 5% of their subscribers take up 50% of the capacity of their internet usage. So starting in November, they're going to test 20 gig download limits in Reno, NV, for DSL services and increasing to 150 gigs at the 10 mbs level, or approximately 75 DVD quality movie downloads per month.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-8564715448238200935?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/8564715448238200935/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=8564715448238200935&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/8564715448238200935'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/8564715448238200935'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/11/atts-pareto-principle.html' title='ATT&apos;s Pareto Principle'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-9119051438906612710</id><published>2008-11-05T10:54:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-11-05T11:00:31.244-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='antitrust'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='yahoo'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Google'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='privacy'/><title type='text'>Google's Growth and Ad Deal</title><content type='html'>There's two good stories out there this week about Google.  First, there's substantial questions about Google's storage of search queries.  As the &lt;a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/news/ap/20081103/ap_on_hi_te/tec_google_privacy"&gt;Yahoo&lt;/a&gt; article says:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:georgia;"&gt;Why does Google log the details of search queries for so long? What does it do with the information? Does it combine data from the search engine with information it collects through other avenues — such as its recently released Web browser, Chrome?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The other story is that Yahoo and Google have redefined their internet advertising partnership agreement to help settle antitrust concerns at the Justice Department.  According to the Wall Street Journal, Yahoo would be limited to just 25% of the search advertising revenues, the agreement would sunset in two years, and Google's customers will have the option to opt-out of the deal.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-9119051438906612710?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/9119051438906612710/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=9119051438906612710&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/9119051438906612710'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/9119051438906612710'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/11/googles-growth-and-ad-deal.html' title='Google&apos;s Growth and Ad Deal'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-7548602607916091008</id><published>2008-09-13T09:36:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-09-13T09:44:20.645-04:00</updated><title type='text'></title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-7548602607916091008?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/7548602607916091008/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=7548602607916091008&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/7548602607916091008'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/7548602607916091008'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/09/come-see-cyndis-audition.html' title=''/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-1921785265706782124</id><published>2008-09-02T14:35:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-09-02T14:43:32.089-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Get Your New Web Browser Here!</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/chrome"&gt;Chrome was supposed to be released today by Google&lt;/a&gt;.  But I don't see anything yet.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-1921785265706782124?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/1921785265706782124/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=1921785265706782124&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1921785265706782124'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1921785265706782124'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/09/get-your-new-web-browser-here.html' title='Get Your New Web Browser Here!'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-727599587154127026</id><published>2008-09-02T14:28:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-09-02T14:35:06.006-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Opt-Out's Don't Work - Proof</title><content type='html'>NebuAd, Inc., provides monitoring of websurfing so that an ISP can provide targeted advertising to its clients.  Six of the smaller ISPs reported the following results:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Bresnan Communications - 18 people opted out of the trial out of 6000 participants&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Cable One - 14000 customers, no specific notice, no opt outs&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;CenturyTel - 82 opt outs, 20000 affected subscribers&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Embarq Corp. - 15 out outs with 26000 participants&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Knology - unknown&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;WideOpenWest - 330000 customers and 3,355 out-outs, though many from the same customer&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;All these companies did suspend the trial and testing because of privacy and related issues.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think these numbers are quite telling on how effective the out-out strategy really is.  With those number of opt-outs, I question how many people were really informed of the intrusion into their privacy they faced.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-727599587154127026?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/727599587154127026/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=727599587154127026&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/727599587154127026'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/727599587154127026'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/09/opt-outs-dont-work-proof.html' title='Opt-Out&apos;s Don&apos;t Work - Proof'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-6230640440437725524</id><published>2008-09-01T16:12:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-09-01T16:17:04.487-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Political Bedfellows not Trademark Friendly</title><content type='html'>Living Liberally, LLC, is suing Blue State Coffee Inc. over the latter's use of the &lt;a href="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&amp;amp;state=42938o.2.1"&gt;Drinking Liberally trademark&lt;/a&gt;.  The lawsuit, filed in the Southern District of New York, alleges that the trademark's use is deliberately similar to Living Liberally's Drink Liberally campagin, and in bad faith.  It's seeking cancellation of the trademark as well.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-6230640440437725524?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/6230640440437725524/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=6230640440437725524&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6230640440437725524'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6230640440437725524'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/09/political-bedfellows-not-trademark.html' title='Political Bedfellows not Trademark Friendly'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-9103624812648430529</id><published>2008-09-01T16:09:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-09-01T16:12:38.049-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Comcast's New Limits</title><content type='html'>According to Comcast, starting October 1, 2008, users will only be allowed to use 250 gigs of internet traffic per month.  Normal users average 2 to 3 gigs per month.  I'm wondering how this affects commercial and business users.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-9103624812648430529?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/9103624812648430529/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=9103624812648430529&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/9103624812648430529'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/9103624812648430529'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/09/comcasts-new-limits.html' title='Comcast&apos;s New Limits'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-4550380755357023425</id><published>2008-08-11T09:31:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-08-11T09:38:09.840-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Records Must Remain Records</title><content type='html'>It's quite normal that in security arbitration settlements that the parties agree to expunge records.  Recently, in &lt;a href="http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/docs/common/opinions/200807/07-7080-1127488.pdf"&gt;Karsner v. Lothian&lt;/a&gt; the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia questioned those practices.  Although in this particular case the question presented was whether a state securities commissioner had a right to intervene to halt the confirmation of the arbitration award ordering expungement (which the Court of Appeals said she had), the language and the rest of the case suggests that the Court of Appeals was sympathetic with the state securities commissioner's arguments that such an expungement order may affect the integrity of her records.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-4550380755357023425?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/4550380755357023425/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=4550380755357023425&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4550380755357023425'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4550380755357023425'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/08/records-must-remain-records.html' title='Records Must Remain Records'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-6184349194902024374</id><published>2008-08-04T12:23:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-08-04T12:26:03.306-04:00</updated><title type='text'>FCC Ruling on Comcast / Internet Neutrality</title><content type='html'>The &lt;a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284286A1.pdf"&gt;FCC voted 3-2&lt;/a&gt; that Comcast's policy of blocking some internet traffic for users who use file sharing software was a violation of network neutrality.  Comcast sounds like they are going to appeal the ruling.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-6184349194902024374?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/6184349194902024374/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=6184349194902024374&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6184349194902024374'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6184349194902024374'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/08/fcc-ruling-on-comcast-internet.html' title='FCC Ruling on Comcast / Internet Neutrality'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-965105874978469888</id><published>2008-07-31T12:31:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-08-04T12:43:15.670-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Cell Phone Termination Fees</title><content type='html'>A California Superior Court judge ruled that early termination fees for cell phone users is an illegal practice under state law.  The preliminary judgement orders Nextel to pay customers some $18.2 million in reimbursement, and enjoins the collection efforts of $54.7 million.  This ruling is going to affect everything from the current rates to hardware costs.  Many companies use hardware discounts as an incentive to lock in long term contracts.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-965105874978469888?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/965105874978469888/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=965105874978469888&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/965105874978469888'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/965105874978469888'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/07/cell-phone-termination-fees.html' title='Cell Phone Termination Fees'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-5418298456683885024</id><published>2008-07-31T12:26:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-08-04T12:30:20.698-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Subpoenas</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2008cv0409-49"&gt;Judge John Bates ruled&lt;/a&gt; that senior Presidential advisors must oblige Congressional subpoenas, going against a couple of decades of arguments re executive privledge.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-5418298456683885024?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/5418298456683885024/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=5418298456683885024&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/5418298456683885024'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/5418298456683885024'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/07/subpoenas.html' title='Subpoenas'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-6809836216056401608</id><published>2008-07-21T16:32:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-21T16:39:59.683-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Speeding Traps with GPS</title><content type='html'>What is the latest in high tech fighting of law enforcement?  Using GPS technology to question radar guns is coming to the forefront in California.  GPS systems can now track the velocity of a vehicle with a significant degree of accuracy and using those GPS records could be evidence against the police radar guns. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;See the Ars Technica story &lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080718-nabbed-for-speeding-gps-data-could-get-you-off-the-hook.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-6809836216056401608?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/6809836216056401608/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=6809836216056401608&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6809836216056401608'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6809836216056401608'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/07/speeding-traps-with-gps.html' title='Speeding Traps with GPS'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-3790824830444145536</id><published>2008-07-21T15:08:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-21T15:10:15.108-04:00</updated><title type='text'>SAG Fight</title><content type='html'>The upcoming SAG strike basically centers around made-for-internet content and the rights of its union members to participate in residuals.  I feel sorry for some of the actors; after all, how can you live in just a small mansion?&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-3790824830444145536?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/3790824830444145536/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=3790824830444145536&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/3790824830444145536'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/3790824830444145536'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/07/sag-fight.html' title='SAG Fight'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-4032502781547929956</id><published>2008-07-21T15:05:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-21T15:08:21.877-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Table Top Fusion</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://news.uns.purdue.edu/x/2008b/080718PurdueReport.pdf"&gt;Purdue found misconduct &lt;/a&gt;by physicist Rusi Taleyarkhan in his behaivor since 2002 when he first claimed he produced nuclear fusion.  For example, he published a paper in 2006 in Physical Review Letters that claimed his 2002 was independently verified, but failed to disclose that the "independently verified" work was extensively done by him.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-4032502781547929956?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/4032502781547929956/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=4032502781547929956&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4032502781547929956'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4032502781547929956'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/07/table-top-fusion.html' title='Table Top Fusion'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-3016117139710857508</id><published>2008-07-21T15:03:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-21T15:05:31.519-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The Most Important Case Ever!!!!</title><content type='html'>A jury decided that Barbie and Bratz dolls are sisters and that the Bratz dolls were created at Mattel, Inc., and not MGA Entertainment.  Still outstanding is whether Mattel owns the copyrights to the original Bratz design drawings, and whether the dolls infringe on the copyrights.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-3016117139710857508?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/3016117139710857508/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=3016117139710857508&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/3016117139710857508'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/3016117139710857508'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/07/most-important-case-ever.html' title='The Most Important Case Ever!!!!'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-590863533088384617</id><published>2008-07-21T15:01:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-21T15:03:22.065-04:00</updated><title type='text'>FCC and Indecendy</title><content type='html'>The &lt;a href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/063575p.pdf"&gt;3rd Circuit&lt;/a&gt; held that the FCC overreached its bounds by fining CBS $550,000 for a "fleeting, isolated or unintended" image when Justin Timberlake accidently exposed Janet Jackson's breast.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-590863533088384617?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/590863533088384617/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=590863533088384617&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/590863533088384617'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/590863533088384617'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/07/fcc-and-indecendy.html' title='FCC and Indecendy'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-1167509513099896921</id><published>2008-06-26T09:16:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-30T09:18:13.715-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='service'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='mobile phones'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='China'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='olympics'/><title type='text'>Phone Moratorium</title><content type='html'>China has ordered a new phone moratorium, "suggesting" to companys that they should be focusing their efforts on the Olympics.  At the current rate, phone companies are adding 9 million new accounts per month.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-1167509513099896921?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/1167509513099896921/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=1167509513099896921&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1167509513099896921'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1167509513099896921'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/06/phone-moratorium.html' title='Phone Moratorium'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-5595700663250878043</id><published>2008-06-26T09:10:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-30T09:16:04.587-04:00</updated><title type='text'>ICANN Approves New Domain Names System</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.icann.org/"&gt;ICANN&lt;/a&gt; approved the first sweeping changes in the 25 year old URL addressing system.  But the new domains won't come cheap, with about $100,000 in costs per domain.  The new process is simple.  An applicant proposes the new domain, and if nobody raises an objection on grounds as racisms, trademark conflicts and similarity to another suffix, the name should be approved quickly.  Also, countries will be able to have non-English characters in domain names as well.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-5595700663250878043?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/5595700663250878043/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=5595700663250878043&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/5595700663250878043'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/5595700663250878043'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/06/icann-approves-new-domain-names-system.html' title='ICANN Approves New Domain Names System'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-2606800148046397136</id><published>2008-06-25T09:08:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-30T09:10:36.424-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='scam'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='spam'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Nigeria'/><title type='text'>Nigerian Scam Busted!</title><content type='html'>Edna Fiedler pleaded guilty to attempting to defraud US citizens with the Nigerian scheck scam.  She made $609,000 from people who fell for it.  Is there anybody who still believes these scams out there?&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-2606800148046397136?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/2606800148046397136/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=2606800148046397136&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2606800148046397136'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2606800148046397136'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/06/nigerian-scam-busted.html' title='Nigerian Scam Busted!'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-1704767948131586398</id><published>2008-06-24T12:01:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-30T09:08:33.060-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='copyright'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='south carolina'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='jurisdiction'/><title type='text'>South Carlonia now has their own copyright</title><content type='html'>In a &lt;a href="http://www.judicial.state.sc.us/opinions/displayOpinion.cfm?caseNo=26505"&gt;South Carolina Supreme Court opinion&lt;/a&gt;, the court ruled that a municipality has a copyright in their own forms and such copyright does not impact the state's freedom of information act.  Maybe somebody forgot &lt;a href="http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00001338----000-.html"&gt;28 USC 1338 &lt;/a&gt;which states:  "The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents, plant variety protection, copyrights and trademarks. Such jurisdiction shall be exclusive of the courts of the states in patent, plant variety protection and copyright cases."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-1704767948131586398?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/1704767948131586398/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=1704767948131586398&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1704767948131586398'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1704767948131586398'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/06/south-carlonia-now-has-their-own.html' title='South Carlonia now has their own copyright'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-61010519549024654</id><published>2008-06-05T13:22:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-05T13:29:36.327-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='virus'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='.gov'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='malware'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='trojan'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='.au'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='mcafee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='.com'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='.info'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='.hk'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='.cn'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='domain names'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='.jp'/><title type='text'>Dangerous Web Domains</title><content type='html'>McAfee, Inc., found that certain domains were a little more dangerous than others.  For example, 19.2% of the .hk domains were dangerous, 11.8% of .cn domains and 11.75% of .info.  Compare this with the most popular domain family, .com, with a little more than 5% of the sites being considered dangerous.  The safest were the .gov, .jp and .au domains, each with less than .3% of sites being dangerous.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The report can be found &lt;a href="http://www.siteadvisor.com/studies/map_malweb_jun2008.pdf"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-61010519549024654?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/61010519549024654/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=61010519549024654&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/61010519549024654'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/61010519549024654'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/06/dangerous-web-domains.html' title='Dangerous Web Domains'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-2773710161506331838</id><published>2008-05-29T12:21:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-29T12:24:43.969-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='lanham'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='yahoo'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='spam'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='trademark'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='lottery'/><title type='text'>You just won the lottery!</title><content type='html'>Yahoo filed a lawsuit on May 16 against spammers who allegedly tricked consumers into thinking they won a contest sponsored by Yahoo.  The major counts are under the Lanham Act, anti-spam laws as well as other state law claims.  You mean that million dollar prize for which I sent Yahoo's lottery coordinator all my financial information isn't real?&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-2773710161506331838?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/2773710161506331838/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=2773710161506331838&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2773710161506331838'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2773710161506331838'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/05/you-just-won-lottery.html' title='You just won the lottery!'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-1416455863125386330</id><published>2008-05-29T12:15:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-29T12:21:39.034-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='supreme court'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='riley'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='illinois'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='alabama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='ryan'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='voting'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='racketerring'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='united states'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='fraud'/><title type='text'>Supreme Court and Govenors</title><content type='html'>The US Supreme Court decided two cases involving governors yesterday:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Gov. George Ryan of Illinois:  the Court rejected, without an opinion, his appeal of racketerring and fraud convictions.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-77.pdf"&gt;Gov. Bob Riley of Alabama&lt;/a&gt;:  the Court agreed with the govenor that he could fill a county commission vacancy notwithstanding the Voting Rights Act of 1965&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-1416455863125386330?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/1416455863125386330/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=1416455863125386330&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1416455863125386330'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1416455863125386330'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/05/supreme-court-and-govenors.html' title='Supreme Court and Govenors'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-3543179244792217457</id><published>2008-05-28T12:25:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-29T12:28:19.405-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='sony'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='box'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='cable'/><title type='text'>No More Set Top Boxes?</title><content type='html'>Sony Electronics reached an agreement with the National Cable and Telecommunications Association (representing about 82% of all cable subscribers) to develop two way cable services such as pay-per-view movies without the use of the cable boxes.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-3543179244792217457?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/3543179244792217457/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=3543179244792217457&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/3543179244792217457'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/3543179244792217457'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/05/no-more-set-top-boxes.html' title='No More Set Top Boxes?'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-8201121033465094595</id><published>2008-05-14T12:12:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-29T12:15:41.636-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='kollin'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='segway'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='mctague'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='condo'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='condominium'/><title type='text'>I made the paper!!!</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/columnists/sfl-flbcondocol0514sbmay14,0,4705116.column"&gt;I made Joe Kollin's column in the Sun-Sentinel!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-8201121033465094595?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/8201121033465094595/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=8201121033465094595&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/8201121033465094595'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/8201121033465094595'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/05/i-made-paper.html' title='I made the paper!!!'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-7937090075385370268</id><published>2008-05-07T12:26:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-08T12:58:33.989-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Why We're Happy</title><content type='html'>A new study from Psychological Science suggests that conservatives are happier than liberals because conservatives are, on average, more rational.  It's amazing that it took a grant from the National Science Foundation just to prove that when I've been saying that conservatives are happier and more rational for years!&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-7937090075385370268?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/7937090075385370268/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=7937090075385370268&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/7937090075385370268'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/7937090075385370268'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/05/why-were-happy.html' title='Why We&apos;re Happy'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-1416369148045054503</id><published>2008-05-05T13:47:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-05T13:55:20.443-04:00</updated><title type='text'>E-Bay v. Craigslist</title><content type='html'>The legal dispute between the companies is whether Kijiji, eBay's classified ads site, engages in a competative activity with Craigslist, which eBay owns 24% of as a result of a purchase of stock from a former Craigslist executive.  Because of the launch of Kijiji in 2007, Jim Buckmaster said, "We are no longer comfortable having eBay as a shareholder, and wish to explore options for our repurchase." After that, according to the complaint filed by eBay, Craigslist founder Craig Newmark and Buckmaster "engaged in a series of clandestine transactions designed to ensure that eBay would not be able to elect a director, and to either impose new transfer restrictions on eBay or dilute its interests, and to dilute the interest of the employee holders of company stock options."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The complaint is &lt;a href="http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/ebay/226550478x0x192471/5a92c5ee-98c3-4a85-a507-0ecd8c81e41b/eBay_LetterwithPublicRedactedVerifiedComplaint.pdf"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-1416369148045054503?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/1416369148045054503/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=1416369148045054503&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1416369148045054503'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1416369148045054503'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/05/e-bay-v-craigslist.html' title='E-Bay v. Craigslist'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-2842222381309409698</id><published>2008-05-04T13:55:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-05T13:58:48.392-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Iron Man</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMTcxMzU4OTg4Nl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwODM2NDI2MQ@@._V1._SY400_SX600_.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMTcxMzU4OTg4Nl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwODM2NDI2MQ@@._V1._SY400_SX600_.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;Terrific movie! A must-see! One thing to look out for is Samuel Jackson's cameo appearence as Nick Fury. Did anybody catch it? I may have turned away when it came on.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-2842222381309409698?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/2842222381309409698/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=2842222381309409698&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2842222381309409698'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2842222381309409698'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/05/iron-man.html' title='Iron Man'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-8747318946264196011</id><published>2008-04-30T13:58:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-05T14:05:18.616-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Copywriting Malware?</title><content type='html'>Symantec &lt;a href="http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/security_response/weblog/2008/04/copyright_violations_in_the_un.html"&gt;is reporting&lt;/a&gt; that there is a new virus floating around.  What makes it unique is that there is a EULA (end user license agreement) with it that threatens "punishment" if a user violates the terms, such as looking at the source code or resell the product.  Quite funny!&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-8747318946264196011?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/8747318946264196011/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=8747318946264196011&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/8747318946264196011'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/8747318946264196011'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/04/copywriting-malware.html' title='Copywriting Malware?'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-2495265303738947738</id><published>2008-04-22T12:22:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-22T12:26:57.068-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Government Not Responsible for What It Says</title><content type='html'>In an option by the 2nd Circuit, the court found that then EPA chief and former NJ govenor Christine Todd Whitman not liable for giving incorrect reassurances after the 9/11 terror attacks by saying that the air near the former World Trade Centers was breathable.  The court said, "But legal remedies are not always available for every instance of arguably deficient governmental performance."  So, let me get this straight, we can't sue our government for screwing up anymore?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov:8080/isysnative/RDpcT3BpbnNcT1BOXDA2LTExNjYtY3Zfb3BuLnBkZg==/06-1166-cv_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov:8080/isysquery/irl4e81/1/hilite"&gt;http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov:8080/isysnative/RDpcT3BpbnNcT1BOXDA2LTExNjYtY3Zfb3BuLnBkZg==/06-1166-cv_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov:8080/isysquery/irl4e81/1/hilite&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-2495265303738947738?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/2495265303738947738/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=2495265303738947738&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2495265303738947738'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2495265303738947738'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/04/government-not-responsible-for-what-it.html' title='Government Not Responsible for What It Says'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-1350599478702480571</id><published>2008-04-22T12:16:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-22T12:19:14.188-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Subpoena Subschena</title><content type='html'>The New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled that the state constitution gives greater protection to unreasonable searches and seizures than the US Constitution and ISPs therefore do not have to disclose any information to anyone without a valid subpoena.  This case is contrary to the Federal trends that found no right to privacy in internet information.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/supreme/A-105-06%20State%20v%20Shirley%20Reid.pdf"&gt;http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/supreme/A-105-06%20State%20v%20Shirley%20Reid.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-1350599478702480571?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/1350599478702480571/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=1350599478702480571&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1350599478702480571'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1350599478702480571'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/04/subpoena-subschena.html' title='Subpoena Subschena'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-8394612902447049138</id><published>2008-04-20T15:51:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-20T16:12:33.530-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Forbidden Kingdom</title><content type='html'>I went to The Forbidden Kingdom last night.  I have to highly recommend it, especially if you are an afficiandado of martial arts films in that there are many references to other martial art films.  For example, the character Swallow is based on Chen Pei Pei's character Golden Swallow in Da Zui Xia (a/k/a Come Drink With Me) and Swallow even says at the end "Come Drink With Me".  The Monkey King is a reference to various Chinese legends, but I think Jet Li plays it as a homage to Shen Da.  Jackie Chan's character, Lu Yan is not only a famous Taoist scholar, but also plays the character as an earlier reference to his breakout film Jui Kuen.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-8394612902447049138?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/8394612902447049138/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=8394612902447049138&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/8394612902447049138'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/8394612902447049138'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/04/forbidden-kingdom.html' title='Forbidden Kingdom'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-6073608402515003483</id><published>2008-04-18T12:22:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-18T12:25:01.659-04:00</updated><title type='text'>FCC on Net Neutrality</title><content type='html'>Net Neutrality is the idea that no traffic should be discriminated against on the internet.  Yet companies, like Comcast, do divert some file sharing and uploading traffic, at least to off-peak hours, in the hope that it won't overload their systems, apparantly in violation of Net Neutrality ideas.  I certainly hope the FCC realizes the only way the internet will work is with the free market Net Neutrality and not have Big Brother telling what files can do what at what times.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-6073608402515003483?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/6073608402515003483/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=6073608402515003483&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6073608402515003483'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6073608402515003483'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/04/fcc-on-net-neutrality.html' title='FCC on Net Neutrality'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-5487645560352683741</id><published>2008-04-18T12:21:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-18T12:22:46.489-04:00</updated><title type='text'>EA / Take-Two Watch</title><content type='html'>EA extended the deadline for proxies yet again.  It looks like only 8% of shareholders have tendered their stock to EA, and the stock is now trading above the tender price.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-5487645560352683741?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/5487645560352683741/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=5487645560352683741&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/5487645560352683741'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/5487645560352683741'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/04/ea-take-two-watch.html' title='EA / Take-Two Watch'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-169620002077883229</id><published>2008-04-18T12:20:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-18T12:21:43.086-04:00</updated><title type='text'>This market</title><content type='html'>I don't understand this market at all.  I do have to agree with Mike Holland's comments this morning on CNBC that this market is a lot like it was 15 to 20 years ago that when a company announced layoffs, the stock went up proportionate to the number of people fired whereas today companies go up depending on how much debt they write off.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-169620002077883229?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/169620002077883229/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=169620002077883229&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/169620002077883229'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/169620002077883229'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/04/this-market.html' title='This market'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-2871537936674133963</id><published>2008-04-13T15:56:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-13T15:59:48.875-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Global Warming, Yet Again</title><content type='html'>Again Al Gore has another competitor:  science.  Scientists at MIT this week unveiled another model of hurricane formation that demonstrated how global warming has absolutely no link on hurricane formation.  Part of it is from research in 2007 that showed fewer hurricanes that global warming models predicted.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-2871537936674133963?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/2871537936674133963/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=2871537936674133963&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2871537936674133963'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2871537936674133963'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/04/global-warming-yet-again.html' title='Global Warming, Yet Again'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-2799609564796439152</id><published>2008-03-31T09:53:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-31T10:13:07.531-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Super Ruling</title><content type='html'>Superman now belongs, once again, in part, to the heirs of Jerome Seigel, one of the original creators of Superman.  A California federal judge ruled that the heirs' copyright termination notice sent in 1999 was valid and that DC Comics/Time Warner had to account for profits from Superman post-1999.  Provided this survives the requisite appeal, this could put in jeapordy the next two Superman films - the Bryan Singer sequel to Superman Returns as well as the Justice League of America franchise - and all the animated series and comic books.  Jerome Schuster's estate can launch a similar lawsuit in 2013.  The two estates previously once a similar case for the Superboy character, but have failed to prove that Superboy happens to be the same Clark Kent in the TV show Smallville (the case is currently still in dispute).  The Superman copyright expires in 2033, unless Congress extends the life of a copyright once again.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-2799609564796439152?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/2799609564796439152/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=2799609564796439152&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2799609564796439152'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2799609564796439152'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/03/super-ruling.html' title='Super Ruling'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-8536950852301779236</id><published>2008-03-31T09:49:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-31T09:53:04.073-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Movie Review: 21</title><content type='html'>21 is a good movie that is loosely based on the book Bringing Down the House by Ben Mezrich.  Kevin Spacey does a normally good interpretation of his character, a mathematics professor at MIT who happens to also be one of the top blackjack players in the world, who despite retirement leads a team of card counting students to Vegas.  Lawrence Fishburne does an outstanding job as the hotel security agent that brings down the team.  Unfortunately for me the team wasn't believable, nor any of the other students featured in the film, but it is worth seeing just to compare with the specials that come on either the History or Discovery Channels (or some channel like that) every so often.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-8536950852301779236?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/8536950852301779236/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=8536950852301779236&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/8536950852301779236'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/8536950852301779236'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/03/movie-review-21.html' title='Movie Review: 21'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-4666705896017480056</id><published>2008-03-30T10:29:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-30T10:31:57.686-04:00</updated><title type='text'>I was thinking . . .</title><content type='html'>I had some medical news this week, and it got me thinking. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Doctors&lt;/strong&gt;:The number of physicians in the U.S. is 700,000.Accidental deaths caused by Physicians per year are 120,000.Accidental deaths per physician is 0.171.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:78%;"&gt;Statistics courtesy of U.S. Dept of Health Human Services.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now think about this:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Guns&lt;/strong&gt;:The number of gun owners in the U.S. is 80,000,000. Yes, that’s 80 million.The number of accidental gun deaths per year, all age groups, is 1,500.The number of accidental deaths per gun owner is .000188.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:78%;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Statistics courtesy of FBI.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So, statistically, doctors are approximately 9,000 times more dangerous than gun owners.Remember, “Guns don’t kill people, doctors do.”FACT: NOT EVERYONE HAS A GUN, BUT ALMOST EVERYONE HAS AT LEAST ONE DOCTOR.Please alert your friends to this alarming threat. We must ban doctors before this gets completely out of hand!!!!!&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-4666705896017480056?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/4666705896017480056/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=4666705896017480056&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4666705896017480056'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4666705896017480056'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/03/i-was-thinking.html' title='I was thinking . . .'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-6413960617131252095</id><published>2008-03-30T10:23:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-30T10:27:58.164-04:00</updated><title type='text'>One more thing on Cung Le</title><content type='html'>I do have to take exception to several commentators last night saying that they thought Cung Le's kicking style was "unorthodox".  Excuse me?  That's classic Tae Kwon Do right there, hardly unorthodox.  To all the critics who say Tae Kwon Do is too sporty and can't win in mixed martial arts, I say nay nay.  Just take a look at Cung Le's decisive win over one of the legends in mixed martial arts history.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-6413960617131252095?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/6413960617131252095/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=6413960617131252095&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6413960617131252095'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6413960617131252095'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/03/one-more-thing-on-cung-le.html' title='One more thing on Cung Le'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-1385169778172350009</id><published>2008-03-30T07:05:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-30T07:11:07.545-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Panthers</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/R-91Qr_e__I/AAAAAAAAAGs/vSfWCGEZiZ8/s1600-h/panthers.jpg"&gt;&lt;img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5183490625674084338" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/R-91Qr_e__I/AAAAAAAAAGs/vSfWCGEZiZ8/s320/panthers.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;Yuck! Yuck! I was at the game last night. The Panthers simply didn't play with any heart. So many times during power plays the Panthers had opportunities to shots on goal, but nothing. They just sat their with the puck. Let's hope that their late season run this year will continue next year.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-1385169778172350009?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/1385169778172350009/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=1385169778172350009&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1385169778172350009'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1385169778172350009'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/03/panthers.html' title='Panthers'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/R-91Qr_e__I/AAAAAAAAAGs/vSfWCGEZiZ8/s72-c/panthers.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-1560021014059979980</id><published>2008-03-30T06:52:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-30T07:02:57.180-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Cung Le Wins!</title><content type='html'>I just wanted to congradulate Cung Le on his impressive victory over Ken Shamrock last night to win the EliteXC middleweight division belt and was the first person to win by interround stoppage due to doctor's orders under modern MMA rules.  Le snapped Shamrock's arm in two during the third round with a roundhouse kick.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I do have to take issue with a MMAWeekly.com who gave the first round to Shamrock.  I think Shamrock took the most damage and Le exhibited better control and dominance over the round.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One other thing about Le.  I am a huge fan of his, but last night showed a major weekness in that he didn't demonstrate any knockout power against Shamrock.  Every major kick and punch landed, but other than a couple of cuts and bruises, Shamrock was taking the damage pretty well.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-1560021014059979980?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/1560021014059979980/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=1560021014059979980&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1560021014059979980'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1560021014059979980'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/03/cung-le-wins.html' title='Cung Le Wins!'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-4574307763868113320</id><published>2008-03-30T06:44:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-30T06:52:45.699-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Braviax / Win Reanimator / Cru629</title><content type='html'>There's a nasty virus that just passed through to America, and there's a lot of bad website information out there on how to remove it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;First, you know you got it when you get it.  It installs a little application which puts a red circle with a white X in it in your sytem tray and periodically pops up a balloon telling you that your computer is infected and it's going to download a solution and would you please click here. Well, it downloads something, but not anything that could be called a solution. It downloads more spyware, trojans, malware, crapware, etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you try to fix it, none of the major antivirus antispyware software will fix it really.  You're going to have to do it manually.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A lot of websites advised taking out some of the programs, but none of them seem to work correctly.  After about a week of tinkering, I came up with a method that worked for me.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Disconnect your computer from the internet.  That way it can't reinstall itself.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reboot your computer in safe mode with command prompt.  That's when you keep pressing F8 at the start up screen until you get back to the old DOS like screen.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Go to the Windows directory on your C drive.  Delete braviax.* and cru629.*&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Next, go to the \systems32 subdirectory and do the same.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Next, go to the \dllcache and \drivers directories and delete the beep.sys file.  Unfortunately, you won't hear a beep anymore on startup unless you save it from another computer and reinstall it on this one.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Last, go into regedit and do a search for the braviax and cru629 programs.  Just delete the named registery edits for the two programs.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;Congradulations!  You should now be clear of the virus.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-4574307763868113320?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/4574307763868113320/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=4574307763868113320&amp;isPopup=true' title='6 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4574307763868113320'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4574307763868113320'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/03/braviax-win-reanimator-cru629.html' title='Braviax / Win Reanimator / Cru629'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>6</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-6952797755869018955</id><published>2008-03-26T20:15:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-26T20:31:02.387-04:00</updated><title type='text'>My Take on the Democrats So Far</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;If you know me, you'd be surpised that I haven't commented that much on the election so far, particularly the two Ajaxes doing battle on the fields of Homer, with musical accompanyment by Offenbach. Anyway, here's my take so far:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;Barak Obama: Great orator and very &lt;a href="http://202.87.40.45/news_image_files/Barak_Obama.bmp"&gt;&lt;img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://202.87.40.45/news_image_files/Barak_Obama.bmp" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;inspirational. But to what end? My concern first and foremost is his policies and lack of experience ("I'll concede any point to any dictator."). Let's not forget his two major scandels in that he got caught waffling on health care reform (he one breath he said he was for socialized medicine, in the next against it), and now with the race debate it's getting interesting. Not only does his pastor at the church he never attends (but exposes his children to) because he's off playing paintball (let's hope his military policy doesn't include supplying paintball guns to everyone) preach a Marxist version of black liberation theology, many of his campaign supporters and inner circle members espouse similar beliefs.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rainews24.it/ran24/immagini/clinton_hillary_candidata.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://www.rainews24.it/ran24/immagini/clinton_hillary_candidata.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Hillary Clinton: Oh where can I begin? Let's start with the latest with her gaffe how she misremembered getting shot at on the Tarmac in Bosnia, insulting the armed forces because they would never allow a First Lady to land in those conditions, although some Presidents would not only allow but cause to happen the Secretary of Commerce to do that if the Secretary of Commerce has blackmail information on the President. Where are her tax documents that showed how much Bill really made on his book? How about her schedule that shows she was more influential in pardongate than she let on, with several campain contributions coming her way immediately thereafter? The list goes on and on.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/McCain-John.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/McCain-John.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;Anyway, it's still early and possibly there might be some scandle to break about McCain, although he was quite vetted by everyone in 2000 and through the primaries.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-6952797755869018955?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/6952797755869018955/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=6952797755869018955&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6952797755869018955'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6952797755869018955'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/03/my-take-on-democrats-so-far.html' title='My Take on the Democrats So Far'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-2939803937640716647</id><published>2008-03-26T20:07:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-26T20:14:50.274-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Take Two on Electronic Arts</title><content type='html'>The other big take-over battle to watch is Electronic Arts $2 billion hostile takeover of Take Two - the company that publishes Grand Theft Auto. Take Two just adopted a poison pill that dilutes the stock if a new shareholder gets 20% or if an old one gets another 2%. Ahhh, this reminds me so much of the 80s. If either side needs a good lawyer, well, I think I can definately help you two.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-2939803937640716647?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/2939803937640716647/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=2939803937640716647&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2939803937640716647'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2939803937640716647'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/03/take-two-on-electronic-arts.html' title='Take Two on Electronic Arts'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-5482053636842187816</id><published>2008-03-24T09:40:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-24T09:54:30.265-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Kudos to Wasserman Schultz</title><content type='html'>Despite many criticisms of her refusal to help support democratic candidates to unseat the Cuban-American delegation out of Dade County, she's steadfastly has stood on the sidelines.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-5482053636842187816?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/5482053636842187816/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=5482053636842187816&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/5482053636842187816'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/5482053636842187816'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/03/kudos-to-wasserman-schultz.html' title='Kudos to Wasserman Schultz'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-6579007503303701059</id><published>2008-03-24T09:33:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-24T09:38:29.409-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Sun-Sentinel</title><content type='html'>I have to take issue with Joe Kollin's&lt;a href="http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/southflorida/sfl-flbcondocol0319sbmar19,0,4159033.column"&gt; article&lt;/a&gt; about struggles at many condominiums after Wilma.  Despite Kollin's nihilistic view of condo life, not all condos were that bad.  Many of the problems could be traced back to bad or mishandling of the claims by their lawyers.  Why doesn't Kollin take a look at a couple of the major communities, hit worse than the ones depicted in his article, that bounced back rather rapidly who did things right?  Without role models for these other associations, people are going to wander in the dark.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-6579007503303701059?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/6579007503303701059/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=6579007503303701059&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6579007503303701059'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6579007503303701059'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/03/sun-sentinel.html' title='Sun-Sentinel'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-7449789995562738211</id><published>2008-03-24T09:19:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-24T09:21:35.710-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Beach Boys Back?</title><content type='html'>The lawsuit over the trademark Beach Boys has finally been settled.  Not much more info is available at this time.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-7449789995562738211?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/7449789995562738211/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=7449789995562738211&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/7449789995562738211'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/7449789995562738211'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/03/beach-boys-back.html' title='Beach Boys Back?'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-1345489150451218704</id><published>2008-03-21T09:16:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-21T09:18:11.021-04:00</updated><title type='text'>First Amendment Victory</title><content type='html'>The 8th Circuit upheld the decision  that Minnesota cannot pass a law that prevented children from buying or renting a violent video game.  The Court wasn't happy with their decision, but they followed precedent and the Constitution which is what they are there for.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-1345489150451218704?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/1345489150451218704/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=1345489150451218704&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1345489150451218704'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1345489150451218704'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/03/first-amendment-victory.html' title='First Amendment Victory'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-1128937351747802829</id><published>2008-03-21T09:13:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-21T09:16:26.818-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Supreme Defeat for Microsoft</title><content type='html'>The Supreme Court turned down Microsoft's appeal from the Fourth Circuit saying that Novell's antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft could proceed, alleging that Microsoft unfairly targed WordPerfect and QuattroPro the same way Mircosoft targeted Netscape's Navigator and Sun's Java.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-1128937351747802829?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/1128937351747802829/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=1128937351747802829&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1128937351747802829'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1128937351747802829'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/03/supreme-defeat-for-microsoft.html' title='Supreme Defeat for Microsoft'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-1423148671181557401</id><published>2008-03-21T09:05:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-21T09:13:31.254-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Dish Network v. TiVo, Part Deux</title><content type='html'>After losing their case in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Dish Network asked for a rehearing because the court erroneously relied on inaccurate testimony from a witness.  There's about $94 million in damages up for grabs here and could be the lifeblood for TiVo to keep them in business.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-1423148671181557401?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/1423148671181557401/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=1423148671181557401&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1423148671181557401'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/1423148671181557401'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/03/dish-network-v-tivo-part-deux.html' title='Dish Network v. TiVo, Part Deux'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-6959235127159449670</id><published>2008-03-18T14:46:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-18T14:49:24.539-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Web Narrows the Media?</title><content type='html'>A new study from the Project for Excellence in Journalism's State of the News Media found that instead of democratizing news, the internet has caused most news websites to repackage other news stories, much like this blog does.  On the flip side, online news media has resurrected the idea of an afternoon newspaper, publishing articles regarding nearly contemporaneous events ahead of the evening news programs and the next day's newspapers.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-6959235127159449670?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/6959235127159449670/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=6959235127159449670&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6959235127159449670'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/6959235127159449670'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/03/web-narrows-media.html' title='Web Narrows the Media?'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-521286248426120175</id><published>2008-03-18T14:42:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-18T14:46:10.284-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Microsoft Licenses Adobe</title><content type='html'>You can now use Adobe Flash and Reader programs on cell phones that run Windows Mobile.  Microsoft expects that 22 million phones will be made that run the Windows Mobile OS and some 500000000 devices with Flash preinstalled, at a 150% year over year growth rate.  It's nice that the Adobe software will be free and Microsoft is picking up the bill.  Personally, I think it's a way to get around the antitrust litigation because Microsoft also has Silverlight which is a competitor to Flash, but this is a nice olive branch.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-521286248426120175?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/521286248426120175/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=521286248426120175&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/521286248426120175'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/521286248426120175'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/03/microsoft-licenses-adobe.html' title='Microsoft Licenses Adobe'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-4630601711386166432</id><published>2008-03-18T14:37:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-18T14:42:41.934-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Outing Sexual Harrassment</title><content type='html'>In California, the 3rd DCA found that if one outed a person's sexual orientation, such could be construed as sexual harrassment and grounds for termination.  &lt;a href="http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/C053673.PDF"&gt;Bell v. Adelberg Associates Medical Group&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-4630601711386166432?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/4630601711386166432/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=4630601711386166432&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4630601711386166432'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4630601711386166432'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/03/outing-sexual-harrassment.html' title='Outing Sexual Harrassment'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-2629516319393369245</id><published>2008-03-18T14:37:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-18T14:37:34.776-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Sorry about that</title><content type='html'>I was sick and got tied up in work.  Should be publishing more entries now.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-2629516319393369245?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/2629516319393369245/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=2629516319393369245&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2629516319393369245'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/2629516319393369245'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/03/sorry-about-that.html' title='Sorry about that'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-4596226691375774991</id><published>2008-02-01T10:56:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-01T10:58:50.339-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Micrhoo</title><content type='html'>Microsoft bid $31 a share for a very vulnerable Yahoo! last night in order to combat Google's dominance in cyberspace.  That would be a very interesting marriage.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-4596226691375774991?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/4596226691375774991/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=4596226691375774991&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4596226691375774991'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/4596226691375774991'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/02/micrhoo.html' title='Micrhoo'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1031640001428556913.post-8643253596668975897</id><published>2008-02-01T10:54:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-01T10:56:29.754-05:00</updated><title type='text'>TiVo Wins the Patent!</title><content type='html'>The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit agreed with a lower court that the DishTV DVR violated TiVo's patent and supported the $89.6 million award to TiVo.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1031640001428556913-8643253596668975897?l=joelmctague.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/feeds/8643253596668975897/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1031640001428556913&amp;postID=8643253596668975897&amp;isPopup=true' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/8643253596668975897'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1031640001428556913/posts/default/8643253596668975897'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://joelmctague.blogspot.com/2008/02/tivo-wins-patent.html' title='TiVo Wins the Patent!'/><author><name>mctague</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00491458993014192156</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='21' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5dpKpRvZKrM/SLxLw8wbyhI/AAAAAAAAAG4/oLzvbXHQvFo/S220/joeldc.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
